Unlike Internet Archive, we're built to survive legal attacks
| Attack Vector | Internet Archive | Droplet Archive |
|---|---|---|
| DMCA Takedown | ❌ Must comply - US-based entity | ✅ No central entity to serve |
| Server Seizure | ❌ Central servers in California | ✅ 1000+ nodes globally |
| Domain Seizure | ❌ Single domain (archive.org) | ✅ IPFS + blockchain addresses |
| Legal Pressure | ❌ Non-profit with board/employees | ✅ Autonomous protocol |
| Content Modification | ❌ Can be forced to edit/remove | ✅ Cryptographically immutable |
| Financial Attack | ❌ Relies on donations to one org | ✅ Node operators self-fund |
Nodes operate in countries with strong data protection laws:
Archives qualify for fair use under:
Mathematical proofs can't be copyrighted:
DeepCycle Systems lawyers send DMCA notice claiming copyright on warranty terms
Archive remains accessible. Company must play whack-a-mole with 1000+ nodes globally.
US government orders all US-based nodes to stop operations
US nodes go down, global network continues. Archive remains fully accessible.
Multiple governments coordinate to ban the protocol
Even if banned, archives remain mathematically verifiable. Truth persists.
Help make the archive more resilient by running a node:
No. Blockchains are decentralized ledgers with no central authority. You'd need to convince thousands of independent validators across the world to remove data, which is technically impossible once confirmed.
We run our own gateways and provide direct IPFS hashes. Users can access content through any IPFS node or gateway worldwide, including their own local node.
No. We archive publicly available web pages for accountability, not copyrighted content for distribution. This is about preserving evidence of corporate policy changes, not entertainment piracy.
We're using blockchain as a tool, not selling tokens. The technology provides immutable timestamps and decentralized storage - practical applications, not speculation.